Legal Opinion

McMullin v. United States

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 12, 2007No. 3:06-cv-172PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ON COLLATERAL SOURCE ISSUE

EISELE, District Judge.

In Defendant’s Trial Brief, the Government raises the issue of whether Plaintiffs can establish the reasonable value of the medical services provided Garrett McMul-lin by introducing bills submitted by medical care providers. The parties agree that Arkansas law, the law of the state where the claim accrued, governs. 28 U.S.C. § 2674.

The Government states that Garrett McMullin’s medical bills were paid by Medicaid. The Government further states that the health care providers entered into agreements providing that they will not collect from…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ina M. Overton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. Arthur v. CatourIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Bennett v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. FreemanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Hamilton v. SloverSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wills v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  2. White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Coy's Honey Farm Inc v. Bayer CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2025
  4. Weatherly v. Allstate Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2022
  5. White v. Jubitz Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API