Legal Opinion

Jewel Companies, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1974No. 46070PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Davis

The claimant, Virgil Ball, received an award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the circuit court of Cook County overruled the decision of the Industrial Commission. This is an appeal from that judgment.

The factual dispute is very narrow. Ball was employed by Jewel Companies, Incorporated (Jewel), as an apprentice mechanic at its Melrose Park facility. This facility encompassed several square blocks and was fenced. Due to its size, several different cafeterias and restaurants were provided so that the employees could purchase meals on the premises. There were no restrictions as to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Eugene Dietzen Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Material Service Corp. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. United Disposal & Recovery Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Orr v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Caterpillar Tractor Co. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Paganelis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Scheffler Greenhouses, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Parro v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Unger v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API