Legal Opinion
A. R. A. Manufacturing Co. v. Pierce
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1959No. 6428PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Justice.
This is an action to recover damages for breach of a contract of exclusive distributorship. It arose by way of a counterclaim by appellees to a claim for moneys owing asserted by appellant (the validity of which was admitted at the trial), and comes to us on appeal from a judgment upon a jury verdict for appellees on their counterclaim.
Appellant, a manufacturer of automobile air conditioning units, conceded that, by written contract, it had granted to appellee Arctic an exclusive distributorship for the sale of appellant’s product in the State of Arizona, effective from…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Wood v. . Duff-GordonNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- The Kronprinzessin CecilieSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Grand Trunk Western R. Co. v. HW Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Jacob v. MinerArizona Supreme Court · 1948
- Helgar Corporation v. . Warner's FeaturesNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United California Bank v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Gilmore v. CohenArizona Supreme Court · 1963
- Northern Arizona Gas Service, Inc. v. Petrolane Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Boswell v. Rio De Oro Uranium Mines, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Cole v. GerhartCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.