Legal Opinion

Hocutt v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 12, 1996No. 2-95-533-CRPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRIGHAM, Justice.

Appellant Cindy Marie Hocutt was convicted by a jury of felony driving while intoxicated with two previous convictions. The jury then assessed punishment at confinement in the Institutional Division for the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for ten years. Hocutt brings three points of error, all of which pertain to the State’s decision to seek a deadly weapon finding. Because we find that the State did not provide adequate notice of its intent to seek the special finding, we affirm the conviction but reverse and remand for new trial on punishment.

BACKGROUND

Hocutt,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rose v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
  2. Ex Parte PattersonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  5. Luken v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Turro v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1997
  3. Patterson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004
  4. Sanders v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
  5. Flenteroy v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API