Schwartz v. Arata
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County dissolving a restraining order and denying a motion for an injunction pendente lite. T. A. Norton, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The appeal is by the plaintiff from an order dissolving a restraining order and denying a motion for an injunction pendente lite.
This complaint is verified and is in two counts. In the first thereof it is stated that one Charles Margaroli is the owner of certain land in the county of San Luis Obispo; that, on August 14, 1917, said Margaroli “let the said premises to plaintiff for ten years from said day; that the defendants withhold possession thereof from the plaintiff, to the great, damage of the plaintiff in the sum of five thousand dollars. ’ ’
In the second count, the allegations of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Willis v. LauridsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Hunt v. SteeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- St. Louis Street Flushing Mach. Co. v. Sanitary Street Flushing Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Rogers v. TennantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- White v. NunanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gosney v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Tahoe Keys Property Owners' Ass'n v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Tiburon v. Northwestern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- City & County of San Francisco v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.