May v. Charles Hoertz & Son
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Industrial Accident Board. Frances May presented her claim for compensation against Charles Hoertz & Son and others for the accidental death of her husband in defendants’ employ: On petition of claimant against Thompson & Temple for an adjustment of attorneys’ fees in said matter. From an order determining the amount due, defendants bring certiorari.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This is a controversy between the claimant and her attorneys, Thompson & Temple, relating to the amount of attorney fees due to the latter for their services and expenses in the litigation of claimant’s claim for compensation in Opitz v. Hoertz, 194 Mich. 626. In that case this court held that the owner of the premises, Brown & Sehler Co., was liable under the workmen’s compensation law. After that case was remanded to the industrial accident board for further proceedings, such further proceedings were had which resulted in the allowance to claimant, as the dependent of her deceased husband,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mackin v. Detroit-Timkin Axle Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Cunningham v. Northwestern Improvement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1911
- Hawkins v. BleakleyDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1914
- Opitz v. HoertzMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
3Cited by10 opinions
- Solomon v. A. W. Farney, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1939
- Gross v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Sarja v. Pittsburgh Steel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- In Re MauryMontana Supreme Court · 1934
- Huff v. Industrial Accident BoardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.