Legal Opinion

Huff v. Industrial Accident Board

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided April 23, 1981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Industrial Accident Board [Board] which denied plaintiff’s application to permit payment by plaintiff to his attorney of a fee in excess of $2,250 in connection with a settlement of a claim for permanency benefits and disfigurement benefits. The private fee agreement between plaintiff and his attorney had provided for a fee in excess of the $2,250 maximum fee permitted by Board Rule 24(A).

The plaintiff’s claim for permanency benefits had been filed with the Board. One week before the scheduled hearing of the claim, a settlement was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Yeiser v. DysartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. General Motors Corporation v. CoxSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
  3. State ex rel. Smith v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  4. State ex rel. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. Dysart v. YeiserNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Willingham v. Kral Music, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1985
  2. Joseph v. C.C. Oliphant Roofing Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1997
  3. Kelly v. J & J CORP.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1982
  4. Joseph v. OliphantSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  5. Jennings v. HitchensSuperior Court of Delaware · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API