Legal Opinion

In Re Maury

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1934No. 7,325PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Anderson

Sheldon Breeden filed a complaint in this court against H. L. Maury and A. G. Shone, practicing attorneys at Butte, alleging misconduct on their part in reserving for their use and benefit excessive amounts from the proceeds of a partial payment of an award under the Workmen’s Compensation Act made to the complainant.

The Attorney General suggested that special counsel be appointed to investigate the matter and, the members of the court concurring, John M. Kline, Esq., of Glasgow, an attorney and counselor of high standing, was appointed to investigate the complaint and report to this court…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Yeiser v. DysartSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Mills v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Holliday v. O'LearyMontana Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Gow v. MauryMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. H. Earl Clack Co. v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. RuonaMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Dewitt v. Richmond CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Williams v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Bancredit, Inc. v. BetheaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. State Ex Rel. State Board of Education v. NagleMontana Supreme Court · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API