Sample v. Monsanto Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIPPEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. Because I granted summary judgment on the tort claims, only the antitrust claims are before me in this case. Following extensive briefing and a two-day hearing held on April 28-29, 2003, I must deny plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. My analysis follows.
Introduction
In this putative class action, corn and soybean farmers claim that defendants Monsanto, Pioneer and Syngenta conspired to fix, raise, maintain, or stabilize prices on genetically modified (GM) Roundup…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- John D. Szabo, Doing Business as Zatron v. Bridgeport MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Meijer, Inc. v. Warner Chilcott Holdings Co. III, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- In re Rubber Chemicals Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
- Dale v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- In re Urethane Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.