Legal Opinion
In re Universal Service Fund Telephone Billing Practices Litigation
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided February 13, 2004No. 02-MD-1468-JWLPublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
This multidistrict litigation consists of numerous putative class action lawsuits arising from the practices of defendants AT & T Corporation (“AT & T”) and Sprint Communications Company, L.P. (“Sprint”) and non-parties MCI WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. and MCI WorldCom Communications, Inc. (collectively “MCI”)1 of charging their customers to recoup their contributions to the federal Universal Service Fund (“USF”) program. Plaintiffs are customers *664or former customers of defendants and MCI who allege defendants engaged in an illegal scheme of…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Grigson v. Creative Artists Agency, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Dupler v. Costco Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Cheryl Slade v. Progressive Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- In re Vitamin C Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATIONDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Thompson v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.