Legal Opinion

Waknin v. Chamberlain

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 2002No. Docket 120299PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant was convicted of assault and battery. Plaintiff, the victim, then brought this civil suit against defendant for assault and battery, in part on the basis of the same act that resulted in defendant's conviction. The trial court, relying on Wheelock v. Eyl, 393 Mich. 74,79; 223 N.W.2d 276 (1974), held that evidence of defendant's conviction could not be introduced in this civil case. The jury thereafter returned a verdict of no cause of action. The trial court, relying on its earlier decision and MRE 403, denied plaintiff's motion for a new trial. The Court of Appeals, relying on MRE…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. LukityMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. United States v. Stephen Roderick McRaeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. People v. StarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LeGrowMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. People v. GurskyMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Hecht v. National Heritage Academies, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Chapin v. a & L PARTS, INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API