Legal Opinion
Chapin v. a & L PARTS, INC.
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided January 30, 2007No. Docket 257917PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.
Defendants DaimlerChrysler Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors Corporation, and Honeywell, Inc., appeal by leave granted a stipulated order dismissing this case with prejudice.1 This appeal arises from the trial court’s decision to admit plaintiffs Phillip R. and Bernie M. Chapin’s expert’s testimony. Defendants filed a motion in limine to exclude that testimony, and the trial court denied that motion. This Court, Wilder, EJ., and Kelly and Murray, JJ., vacated the order denying the motion and remanded for an evidentiary hearing. Unpublished order of the Court of Appeals, entered…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Craig v. Oakwood HospitalMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Gilbert v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Johanna Woodard v. University of Mich Medical CtrMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- People of Michigan v. Elamin MuhammadMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Lenawee County v. WagleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- Anglers of AuSable, Inc. v. Department of Environmental QualityMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. BregarNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2016
- Elher v. MisraMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.