Legal Opinion

People v. Mills

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1995No. Docket Nos. 100058, 100059PublishedCited by 247 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallett, J.

We granted leave in this case1 to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in granting the defendants, Vester Mills and James Camilli, a new trial on the basis that seventeen color slides shown to their juries, that depicted the victim’s severe burn wounds over more than sixty percent of her body, were unfairly prejudicial. In addition, only with respect to defendant Mills, we granted leave to determine whether the Court of Appeals erred in granting him a new trial on the ground that his jury should have been instructed on the defenses of "accident” and "intoxication.”

We reverse the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. People v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. GarceauCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. FalknerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by247 opinions

  1. People v. EricksenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. People v. CrawfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. SabinMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. RiddleMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Eric W. Taylor v. Pamela WithrowCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

242 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API