Legal Opinion

Eason v. Rice

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 8, 1925No. 16074PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUTH, O.

In this opinion G. T. Rice will be designated as plaintiff, William Eason as defendant, and Charley Ea-son as intervener. Plaintiff obtained judgment in a justice of the peace court against defendant, and on February 16, 1924, filed his abstract of judgment in the district court and issued- execution, and on March 11, 1924, the sheriff of McClam county levied raid execution on lot 5, block 36, in the city of Purcell, as the property of defendant, and advertised the property for sale on March 14, 1924, and on March 15, 1924, made his return, showing said lot was sold to Edna…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Turben v. DouglassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Knights of the MacCabees of the World v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Parks v. RoachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Bernard v. McRaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Reuck v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Phelan v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API