Legal Opinion

Parks v. Roach

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 1922No. 10973PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

On the 10th day of August, 1918, Sarah C. Roach, as plaintiff, commenced an action in the district court of Creek county, Okla., against James R. Parks and Mrs. Minnie Lee Cornelius, executors of the will and estate of W. D. Cornelius, deceased; Mrs. Minnie Lee Cornelius, as guardian of W. S. Cornelius, a minor; and the adult heirs of said W. D. Cornelius, Minnie Lee Dillon, nee Cornelius, daughter, and Ralph P. Cornelius, son, as defendants.

The plaintiff in her amended petition, which was later filed, sought,a recovery of her homestead allotment and rent, and for the cancellation of her…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Harris v. BellSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Bilby v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  4. Black v. DonelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Brader v. JamesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Nickel v. JandaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Howe v. TarloshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Baldridge v. ZiglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Florence Springer v. G. L. TownsendCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
  5. Jones v. MeadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API