Legal Opinion

Dietrich Industries, Inc. v. Abrams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 30, 1982No. 316PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Appellant filed a complaint against appellee, Attorney David Abrams, who represented Jonnet Corporation in a series of legal actions against appellant. In its five-count complaint, appellant alleges malicious use of process and/or abuse of process with respect to three separate actions instituted by appellee. Preliminary objections and demurrers to each count were filed and sustained by the trial court and the complaint was dismissed without leave to amend. This appeal followed. 1

To properly analyze appellant’s claims, it is necessary to outline the procedural history of the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Brocker v. BrockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Publix Drug Co. v. Breyer Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Byers v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. Otto v. American Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  2. U.S. Express Lines, Ltd. v. HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
  3. Rosen v. American Bank of RollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Orange Stones Co. v. City of ReadingCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Shaffer v. StewartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API