Legal Opinion

Publix Drug Co. v. Breyer Ice Cream Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 21, 1943No. Appeal, 56PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Parker,

The plaintiff in this action charged that the defendant “wilfully, maliciously and without any reason therefor” caused two judgments to be entered by confession against plaintiff to its serious damage. A jury returned a verdict for $12,000 against defendant and the court below entered judgment n. o. v. in favor of defendant. Plaintiff has appealed. The judgment must be affirmed.

On June 27,1939, Breyer Ice Cream Company entered judgments by confession on two judgment notes payable to it. One note was for $2,891.81, dated August 31,1937, signed by Publix Drug Co.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mayer v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  2. Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Johnson v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Muldoon v. RickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
  5. Kramer v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  2. T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Rosen v. American Bank of RollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. McGee v. FeegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Byers v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API