Publix Drug Co. v. Breyer Ice Cream Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Parker,
The plaintiff in this action charged that the defendant “wilfully, maliciously and without any reason therefor” caused two judgments to be entered by confession against plaintiff to its serious damage. A jury returned a verdict for $12,000 against defendant and the court below entered judgment n. o. v. in favor of defendant. Plaintiff has appealed. The judgment must be affirmed.
On June 27,1939, Breyer Ice Cream Company entered judgments by confession on two judgment notes payable to it. One note was for $2,891.81, dated August 31,1937, signed by Publix Drug Co.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mayer v. WalterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Altman v. Standard Refrig. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Johnson v. Land Title Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Muldoon v. RickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883
- Kramer v. StockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Rosen v. American Bank of RollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- McGee v. FeegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Byers v. WardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.