Legal Opinion

Shaffer v. Stewart

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 2, 1984No. 343PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

May an attorney who, without probable cause, files a caveat to the probate of a will for the sole purpose of “extracting an unwarranted settlement” be sued for malicious use of process after he and his client have agreed to a dismissal of the caveat? The trial court held that such actions could not be maintained because there had been no seizure of property. Therefore, it sustained preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer to the complaint and entered judgment in favor of the attorney. This appeal followed. We reverse.

Richard F. Buser died August 17, 1981, leaving a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vattimo v. Lower Bucks Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Triester v. 191 Tenants Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Dietrich Industries, Inc. v. AbramsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Graham v. Today's SpiritSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Di Sante v. Russ Financial Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Pelagatti v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Rosen v. American Bank of RollaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Hart v. O'MALLEYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Al Hamilton Contracting Co. v. CowderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API