Lusk v. Parmer

MARTIN, Justice.

We have concluded that we erred ins affirming this case, and to conserve space-j we substitute this in lieu of the original! opinion heretofore rendered.

The parties to this appeal will carry the same designation as in the trial court.

Plaintiff sued defendants to foreclose a. judgment lien alleged to exist against a quarter section of land. The defendants by appropriate answer tendered the issue that such land was the separate estate of defendant Pauline Parmer, wife of defendant B. B. Parmer, and not liable for the debts of the latter. Trial was to the court, who rendered…