Legal Opinion

John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. Bennett

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1939No. 7318PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

It is. believed that the statement of the case can best be followed by employing here the designations given the parties in the trial court, wherein Tom R. Bennett, two of his three brothers and his three sisters, children of I. M. Bennett, deceased, and his surviving widow, Mrs. Dora E. Bennett, were plaintiffs and John Hancock Mutual Life Insuance Company was defendant. The suit is an action of trespass to try title to 70 acres of land in Johnson County and for partition thereof. It resulted in the trial court in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Dakan v. DakanTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gleich v. BongioTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Claiborne v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Kearse v. KearseTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. Smith v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1886

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Maupin v. ChaneyTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. McFaddin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  3. Potter v. PotterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  4. Kunkel v. KunkelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Walker-Smith Co. v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API