Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 12, 1938No. 393PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANTON, Circuit Judge.
The petitioner seeks enforcement of an order isued by it against both respondents pursuant to § 10(c) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 151 et seq., 160(c), 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 151 et seq., 160(c). Jurisdiction of this court is provided for by § 10(e), 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e).
Charges were filed by the Metal Polishers International Union, Local No. 8 and the Milk Drivers Local No. 584, International Brotherhood of Teamsters and Helpers, charging the respondent Hop-wood with certain unfair labor practices, affecting commerce within the meaning of the act. ■
May 24,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
- Federal Baseball Club of Baltimore, Inc. v. National League of Professional Baseball ClubsSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Hopkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Metropolitan Holding Co. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Boatmen's BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Hopwood Retinning Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Great Southern Trucking Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- National Labor Relations Board v. Somerset Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. National Licorice Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.