Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Woodworth v. Zimmerman

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 1883No. 9767PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This action was instituted by the appelleesJacob C. Zimmerman and William Henderson to establish a lien on real property and adjust priorities. Woodworth filed a cross complaint, wherein he alleged that prior to September 1st, 1874, the mortgaged premises were owned by Joseph Henderson, E. W. Straus and Samuel Braden; that they were-partners; that the property was a mill and its appurtenances, and was used by the firm as partnership property; that on the 1st day of September*, 1874, appellant bought the interest-of Straus in the property and in the partnership; that Joseph Henderson was the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ulrich v. DrischellIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Greenup v. CrooksIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Dumont v. DuforeIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Ætna Life Insurance v. FinchIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Davenport v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1875

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Robertson v. Van CleaveIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Horn v. Indianapolis National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Craighead v. DaltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Adair v. MergentheimIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API