Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. Carpenter Motor Car Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 17, 1929PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBkogdeN, J.

The trial judge instructed the jury as follows: “Now, gentlemen of the jury, the fact that a man may drive in excess of the legal rate of speed is not in itself negligence. A man may drive in excess of the legal rate of speed, and at the same time may not be guilty of negligence at all. He may be a careful and competent driver, and he may exceed the speed limit and he may not be driving recklessly and carelessly, and that would not constitute negligence in itself. The law says, however, when you have other evidence of negligence, that you may consider that as a circumstance just as you would…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ledbetter v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  3. Davis v. . LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Gillis v. Transit Corp. of NorfolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Peters v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Minnis v. . SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Wolfe v. Independent Coach Line, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Cook v. . HorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API