Legal Opinion

Davis v. . Long

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1925PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.

Defendant made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. C. S., 567. The court below refused these motions and in this we think there was no error.

On a motion to nonsuit, the evidence is to be taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff, and he is entitled to the benefit of every reasonable intendment upon the evidence and every reasonable inference to be drawn therefrom. Christman v. Hilliard, 167 N. C., 6; Oil Co. v. Hunt, 187 N. C., 157; Hanes v. Utilities Co., 188 N. C., 465.

In the progress of the trial the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McKinnon v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Leathers v. Blackwell Durham Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Christman v. . HilliardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. Starnes Ex Rel. Starnes v. Albion Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. McNeill v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Goss Ex Rel. Goss v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  2. State v. . ShipmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. York v. YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. . ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Yellow Cab Co. of Charlotte, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API