Miller v. Loft, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
One ground of demurrer is that the bill fails to show that any demand was ever made upon the board of directors of Loft, Inc., to institute suit upon any of the causes of action alleged in the bill to exist, and that it does not appear from the bill that such demand would be futile. The rule is well settled in this State that if by reason of hostile interest or guilty participation in the wrongs complained of, the directors cannot be expected to institute suit, or if a suit is instituted it is apparent that the directors would not be the proper persons to conduct it, no demand…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sohland v. BakerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1927
- Zell Guano Co. v. HeatherlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ellis v. Penn Beef Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1911
- Fleer v. Frank H. Fleer Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
- Harden v. Eastern States Public Service Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Kaplan v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- Elster v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Elster v. American AirlinesCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- Star Publishing Co. v. MartinSuperior Court of Delaware · 1953
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.