Kaplan v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice:
This is an appeal from a decision by the Court of Chancery dismissing a shareholders derivative action brought by plaintiffs, Bernard Kaplan, Martin Fox and Warren Opal (the “Plaintiffs”) on behalf of The Chase Manhattan Corporation (“Chase”) against Chase’s independent auditor Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. (“Peat Marwick”). Plaintiffs allege that as a result of Peat Marwick’s negligence and breach of contract, Chase has suffered significant losses in two separate investment transactions. Peat Marwick moved to dismiss the action for failure to satisfy the demand requirements of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1939
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Grimes v. DonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Levine v. SmithSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Spiegel v. BuntrockSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- American International Group, Inc. v. GreenbergCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2009
- Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. VertinCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2014
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.