Legal Opinion

Langdeau v. Burke Investment Company

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1962No. A-8810PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

The San Antonio Court of Civil Appeals has held that the venue of an action in trespass to try title against the receiver of an insurance company is governed by Exception 14 of Article 1995, Vernon’s Ann. Texas Civ. Stat., rather than by Section 4(f) of Article 21.28, V.A.T.S. Insurance Code. 1 351 S.W. 2d 287. We have jurisdiction under Subdivision 2 of Article 1728, because such holding is in conflict with the decision of the Austin Court of Civil Appeals in Bennett v. Langdeau, 348 S.W. 2d 179.

It is well settled that Exception 14 2 is mandatory where the privilege is properly claimed by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomson v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Pena v. SlingTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Pena v. SlingTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. South Texas Development Co. v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Mitchell v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Mercantile Nat. Bank at Dallas v. LangdeauSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Wichita County, Texas v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Perryman v. Spart an Tex. Six Capital Partners, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In Re the City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. Portland Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Bevill, Bresler & Schulman Government Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API