Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Porter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 17, 1917No. 8534PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.

R. T. Stuart and Coke W. Harkrider, doing business as partners under the firm name and style of Commonwealth Organization Company, undertook, as promoters, to organize a corporation to be known as the Casualty Bonding & Accident Insurance Company, to be incorporated under the laws of the state of Texas, with an authorized capital stock of $300,000, and a paid-up capital of at least $200,000, free from organization expenses. The promoters planned to charge' each subscriber for stock a certain bonus to go to them as expenses for organizing the corporation and securing a charter necegsary to do…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. De La Vega v. LeagueTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Hickman v. SwainTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Seeligson v. Lewis & WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Texas & Pacific Coal Co. v. LawsonTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  5. National Bank v. Texas Investment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1889

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Grogan-Cochran Lumber Co. v. McWhorterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Langdeau v. Burke Investment CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Mitchell v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. American Canal Co. of Texas v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1964

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API