Legal Opinion

MCA v. State of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1982No. Civ. 24002PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, J..—

The issue in this appeal by M.C.A, whose identity is protected under the federal witness program, is whether the trial court ruled correctly in denying his motion for reimbursement of expenses and attorney fees after he successfully resisted efforts under Penal Code section 1334.21 to compel his attendance before a Florida grand jury. Finding no statutory or common law basis to accommodate his request, we affirm the order.

In M.C.A.’s first appeal, we reversed the section 1334.2 order compelling his appearance before the Grand Jury of Broward County, Florida, and “remanded…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fabricant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Wilson v. HinkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. DeWitt v. BalbenWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In Re StoddardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  3. People v. PetrilliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. DeWitt v. BalbenWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API