Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Fain

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 1983No. AO22049Published

1DissentRouse, J.

I respectfully dissent.

Contrary to the position taken by the majority, my analysis of the parole provisions of the Penal Code does not persuade me that the power to rescind a parole release date arises from the power to grant parole rather than to revoke it. Nor do I agree that the power to rescind a parole release date is one possessed exclusively by the Board of Prison Terms (Board).

*558The majority’s construction of the parole provisions of the Penal Code is based primarily upon the fact that sections 3041.5 and 3041.7 are the only provisions in the Penal Code that specifically refer to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re McLainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. RedmondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. In Re FainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  4. Azeria v. California Adult AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Vogulkin v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API