Legal Opinion
Wolford v. Thomas
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 18, 1987No. A014919PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRILL, J.
Plaintiffs and appellants, Peter and Marguerite Wolford (Wolfords), filed a complaint for abatement of both a public and private nuisance, injunctive and declaratory relief, and damages against defendants and respondents Jeffrey and Evelyn Thomas (Thomases).
In their at-issue memorandum, the Wolfords requested a jury trial. At trial the Thomases made a motion for a court trial, which motion was granted.
During the course of the trial, the Thomases also moved the court to dismiss the Wolfords’ cause of action for a public and private nuisance on grounds of res judicata. The…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. One 1941 Chevrolet CoupeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- C & K ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS v. Amber Steel Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Venuto v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Levy v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Hollywood Circle, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Mira Mar Mobile Community v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Posey v. LeavittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Stell v. Jay Hales Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.