Legal Opinion

In Re Central Vermont Public Service Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 15, 1947PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.

By this petition, brought to this Court by the authority of P. L. 1338, it is sought to prohibit the Hon. Charles B. Adams, a Superior judge, fromproceeding under the provisions of P. L. 1737 to take the testimony of Harold L. Durgin and to require him to produce certain enumerated records of the petitioner.

The antecedent facts, as to which there is no dispute, are these; The City of Rutland brought an action in tort against the Central Vermont Public Service Corporation, hereinafter called the petitioner, alleging negligence in the construction and maintenance of two dams owned and operated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. State Ex Rel. Pitcher v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Guinan v. ReaddySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Phillips v. ElliottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Reed v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959
  2. State v. LamppDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Ramsey v. GardnerTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Hackel v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1961
  5. City of Emmetsburg v. Central Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API