Legal Opinion
Arizona v. California
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided May 21, 1934PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis
On October 13, 1930, Arizona sought, by an original bill, a declaration that the Colorado River Compact and the Boulder Canyon Project Act be decreed to be unconstitutional and void; that the Secretary of the Interior and California, Nevada, Utah, New Mexico, Colorado and Wyoming be permanently enjoined from carrying out said Compact or said Act; and that they be enjoined from performing contracts which had been executed by the Secretary on behalf of the United States for the use of stored water and developed power after the project shall have been completed, and from doing any other thing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Cook v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nielsen v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,925 Dresser Industries, Inc., a Corporation, on Its Own Behalf and on Behalf of Certain Dresser Employees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Bates Block v. Compagnie Nationale Air FranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Evans v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1986
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.