Legal Opinion

City of Emmetsburg v. Central Iowa Telephone Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 5, 1959No. 49661PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, C. J.

Plaintiff’s action is in equity. The petition asserts that the defendant’s franchise permitting it to occupy the streets and alleys in the plaintiff-city and to conduct the business of furnishing telephone service to the city and its residents expired in 1951, and since that time the defendant has been occupying the public streets and alleys without lawful right to do so. It is prayed that the defendant be enjoined from so using and occupying the streets and alleys, that a declaratory judgment be entered holding that it has no right so to do, and for a mandatory injunction commanding it to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Owensboro v. Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. State ex rel. Shaver v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Chamberlain v. Iowa Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1903

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beeck v. Aquaslide 'N' Dive Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Abolt v. City of Fort MadisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. Simpson v. Low-Rent Housing Agency of Mount AyrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1974
  4. Stookey v. StookeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
  5. Sisco v. Iowa-Illinois Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API