Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Phillips v. Elliott

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 27, 1899No. Nos. 11,530—(270)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Alternative writ of mandamus issued from the supreme court requiring respondent, as judge of the district court for the fourth judicial district, to show cause why he should not take the deposition of L. A. Lydiard, city clerk of the city of Minneapolis.

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

The relator, Alonzo Phillips, on December 30, 1898, presented a verified petition to the defendant, Charles B. Elliott, one of the judges of the district court in and for the fourth judicial district in the county of Hennepin, and requested said judge to take the deposition of L. A. Lydiard, city clerk of the city of Minneapolis, and to cause notice to be given of the time and place appointed for taking of said deposition, and to proceed therein as prescribed by G. S. 1894, c. 73, tit. 4 (§§ 5693-5698).

In support of said petition, and as grounds therefor, the petitioner alleged that he was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atkinson v. NashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Booker v. BookerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Central Vermont Public Service Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1947
  2. Dale v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  3. Rozek v. ChristenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  4. Rozek v. ChristenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API