Legal Opinion

Hendricks & Lewis Pllc v. George Clinton

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 26, 2014No. 13-35010PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

ORDER

The Opinion filed June 23, 2014 is hereby amended. The amended opinion, is filed concurrently with this Order.

With these amendments, the panel has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing. Judges Gould and Christen have voted to deny the petition for rehearing en bane, and Judge Fisher has so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

Defendant-Appellant’s petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are DENIED. No…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. John O. England, Trustee of the Estate of Irene Mansfeldt, Bankrupt v. Morgan J. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
  5. United States v. Estate of StonehillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Stephen Yagman v. Eric GarcettiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Esther Yang v. Dongwon Industries Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. N.E. Ex Rel. C.E. v. Seattle School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  5. Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LL v. Christopher JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API