Legal Opinion

Degginger v. Seattle Brewing & Malting Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1906No. 5897PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appeal from an order of the superior court for King county, Brater, J., entered June 22, 1905, after a hearing upon affidavits, restraining the transfer of a liquor license, and directing the delivery of the certificate of license to the plaintiff as receiver.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

This appeal is from an order of the lower court temporarily restraining the defendants from transa ferring a retail liquor license issued by the city to one I. G. Morgan, and directing the Seattle Brewing & Malting Company to deliver the paper evidence of said license to the respondent. It appears from the complaint and the affidavits filed at the hearing that, on December 20, 1904, the city of Seattle issued to I. G. Morgan, of the firm of Stumpf & Morgan, copartners, a retail liquor license, authorizing the *386sale of liquors at retail for the term of one year, at IEsTo. 1222 Second, avenue,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fisher v. CushmanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1900
  2. People v. DuranteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. In re BeckerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1899
  4. Voight v. Board of Excise CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
  5. E. S. Bonnie & Co. v. Perry's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Roehm v. County of OrangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Johnson v. DahlquistWashington Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Claussen v. City of LuverneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
  5. Golden v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API