Legal Opinion
Amoco Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 28, 1986No. C3-86-992PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LESLIE, Judge.
The City of Minneapolis denied Amoco Oil Company’s application for a conditional use permit to operate a twenty-four-hour combination gas station and grocery store because the store conflicted with the city’s comprehensive zoning plan and because it would detrimentally impact upon neighboring residents. Amoco brought an action against the city for declaratory and injunc-tive relief. Both parties moved for summary judgment and the trial court granted the city’s motion, refusing to set aside the city council’s determination. We reverse.
FACTS
Appellant Amoco Oil Company…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Zylka v. City of CrystalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Northwestern College v. City of Arden HillsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Barton Contracting Co., Inc. v. City of AftonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hay v. Township of Grow, Anoka CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Condor Corporation, a Minnesota Corporation v. City of St. Paul, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- City of Chicago Heights v. Living Word Outreach Full Gospel Church & Ministries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Scott County Lumber Co. v. City of ShakopeeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- BBY INVESTORS v. City of MaplewoodCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Chase v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.