Legal Opinion
Brown v. Gino Morena Enterprises
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 1999No. Civ.A. 96-53 SSHPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 and related pleadings. 1 Upon careful consideration, summary judgment is granted in favor of defendants on plaintiffs claim pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185, and plaintiffs pendent' state law claims for defamation are dismissed without prejudice. “Findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions of motions under ■ Rule 12 or 56.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); Summers v. Department of Justice, 140 F.3d 1077, 1079-80…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harris v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Long v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Egilman v. Keller & Heckman, LLP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Bey v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Fitts v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.