Legal Opinion
Harris v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0892PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN S. HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marlon J. Harris, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Amalgamated Transit Union Local 689 (“Union”) seeking reinstatement to his position as an Electrical Mechanic C with the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”). Before the Court is the Union’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth herein, the Union’s motion will be granted.
BACKGROUND
Under the collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) between WMATA and Local 689 of the Amalgamated Transit Union, an employee in plaintiffs position is assessed points…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Economic Research Services, Inc. v. Resolution Economics, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Long v. Safeway, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Bauman v. ButowskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Austin v. American Institute for ResearchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Gullaksen v. United Air LinesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.