Legal Opinion

Harding v. Purtle

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 1, 1969No. Civ. 12010PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.

In a three-car “rear end” automobile collision personal injury action defendants Purtle (the driver) and Elder (owner) of the middle car were granted a summary judgment. Plaintiff Carrie Jo Harding whose ear in front was hit appeals. The basis of the trial court’s order was “that the plaintiffs have not produced any evidence to show that the conduct of Ron B. Purtle was either negligent or a proximate cause of the injuries suffered by the plaintiffs.” But a summary judgment will not be granted if there is a triable issue of fact. Before the party against whom the judg ment is granted has to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Alarid v. VanierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Snider v. SniderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Schessler v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Niederer v. FerreiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. Tool Research & Engineering Corp. v. HenigsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  3. Hector v. Cedars-Sinai Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Kelleher v. Empresa Hondurena De Vapores, SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. People v. Rath Packing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API