People v. Rath Packing Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KERRIGAN, J.
This is an action by the government to enjoin a national meat processor from selling allegedly short-weight packages of bacon at the retail level. From a summary judgment granting the injunction, the packing company appeals.
We hold the court erred in deciding the case summarily. Factual issues exist which can be resolved only by a trial on the merits.
Background Of The Litigation
In February 1972, the County of Riverside (“People” or “County”) brought suit in the Riverside superior court to enjoin the Rath Packing Company (“Rath”) from engaging in “short-weighting” marketing…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Desny v. WilderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Coyne v. KrempelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- In Re RosenkrantzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Rath Packing Co. v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- DeSuza v. AndersackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.