Legal Opinion

Michael Ganley Manuel J. Granroos Michael A. Green Daniel B. Grout Thomas Homa v. Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 3, 2007No. 06-3673PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAM, Circuit Judge.

The appellants, all former officers of the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) who retired from the MPD to become officers with the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board (Park Board), appeal the district court’s 1 grant of summary judgment in favor of the Park Board. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Michael Ganley and four other former MPD police officers sued the Park Board, alleging that the Park Board violated their equal protection and due process rights under the United States and Minnesota Constitutions by denying them higher initial placement on the salary schedule and more…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Collins v. City of Harker HeightsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Washington v. GlucksbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Mills v. City of Grand ForksCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  2. Minnesota Majority v. Joe ManskyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. McDonald v. City of Saint PaulCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. In re the Appeal of WeisgerberSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. American Family Insurance v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API