Legal Opinion
Mills v. City of Grand Forks
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 27, 2010No. 09-2119PublishedCited by 139 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Bruce Roger Mills brought a federal civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Grand Forks (“City”), claiming that the City, fining him for a traffic violation under a city ordinance, with the fine exceeding the amount of money authorized under North Dakota state law, violated various federal constitutional rights. He claims violations of due process of law, equal protection under the law, and to be free from excessive fines. The district court 2 entered a judgment of dismissal on the pleadings under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). Mills appeals. We affirm…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Davis v. BandemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rivera v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by139 opinions
- Illig v. Union Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Dwight Mitchell v. Dakota County Social ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- James Humphrey v. Eureka Gardens Public FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2018
- Ernst v. HinchliffDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- Mulvenon v. GreenwoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.