Legal Opinion
Mayers v. Washington Adventist Hospital
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 27, 2001No. CIV. A. AW-99-3549PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Hala Mayers, brings the instant action alleging that her discharge by Washington Adventist Hospital (‘Washington Adventist”), Adventist Healthcare, and Fred Morgan (collectively “Defendants”) was based upon her race, national origin, and disability in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”), the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”), and the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986, 8 U.S.C. § 1324b (the “IRCA”) and in breach of an implied employment…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Christine Evans v. Technologies Applications & Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Cohens v. Maryland Department of Human ResourcesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Sink v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Resources for Human Development, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2011
- Bennett v. PermanenteDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
- Rose v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.