Legal Opinion
Rose v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided February 26, 2002No. CIV. AMD 01-229PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DAVIS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Gary Rose, brought this one-count action for compensatory and punitive damages against his former employer, Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., pursuant to the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, from which the case was timely removed by defendant to this court in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1441. Rose alleges that defendant violated the ADA by failing to accommodate a disability, namely, vasomotor rhinitis. Discovery has been completed and now pending, inter alia, is defendant’s motion for…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Rodriguez v. Conagra Grocery ProdCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Rodriguez v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Peeples v. Coastal Office Products, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Feldman v. Law Enforcement Associates Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.