Legal Opinion
United States v. Park Hung Quan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1986No. 85-4088PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.
Quan appeals pro se from the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition. He contends that his sentence should be reduced or vacated on these grounds: (a) breach of the plea agreement; (b) fraudulent inducement to obtain the plea agreement; (c) failure of counsel to inform the trial judge of the breach at time of sentencing; and (d) improper consideration by the Parole Board of the presentence report, which had been sealed by court order. He also claims a right to an evidentiary hearing on his petition. We disagree.
FACTS
In June 1983, a grand jury indicted Quan and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Gerald M. Schaflander, United States of America v. Stephen M. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Jane ReadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- United States v. Alberto De La FuenteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Karl KellerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. William John Sutton, United States of America v. Freddie Goldbaum Ortiz, United States of America v. Valentine Frank ProitteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Horace Henry MathewsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- James Jeffrey Grady v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.