Legal Opinion
United States v. Espinoza
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 9, 1988No. 86-5565PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LOVELL, District Judge:
Ruben Espinoza, a federal prisoner, appeals the denial of his motion to vacate, set aside or correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
FACTS
On December 18, 1981, appellant was arrested for bank robbery and a federal detainer was lodged against him. At the time of his arrest, appellant was on outpatient release status from the California Rehabilitation Center and had another state charge pending against him. The state charge resulted in the issuance of an additional warrant for his arrest for violating the conditions of his release from the Rehabilitation Center. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jonah Iaea v. Franklin Sunn, Director of the Department of Social Services, State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Lawrence Leroy Farrow v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Larry W.G. GiddingsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Franklin Eugene Watts, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- United States v. Michael Leslie BlaylockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Ramee Jamal Shah, Aka: Eddie Harris, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Daniel Eugene Frazer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Michael G. Doganiere v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.