Legal Opinion

Douglass v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1897No. 2,510PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From the Marion Criminal Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, J. —

The appellant was convicted for keeping certain devices for the purpose of registering bets and wagers.

The indictment reads as follows: “The grand jurors for the county of Marion, and State of Indiana, upon their oaths present, that William Tron and Samuel L. Douglass, on the 11th day of May, A. D. 1895, at and in the county of Marion, and State aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully keep a certain room there situate, with apparatus, blackboard, blanks, papers, and other devices for'the purpose of recording and registering bets and wagers upon the results of trials and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Fahnestock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Keyes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Miller v. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Indiana Union Traction Co. v. ScribnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. City of New Albany v. SliderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. Thrift Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Chicago Furniture Co. v. CronkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API