Legal Opinion

Chicago Furniture Co. v. Cronk

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 1905No. 5,179PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From Lake Circuit Court; WHUs C. McMahan, Judge. Action by Addie Cronk against the Chicago Furniture Company and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

1. Suit by appellee for the alleged wrongful taking and conversion of personal property, consisting of household goods, wearing apparel, and other property. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict for appellee for *592$200. Overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial is the only error assigned. It is argued that the assessment of the amount of recovery is erroneous, being too large, and that the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence. However, upon a careful reading of all the evidence, we can not disturb the jury’s conclusion. There was a sharp conflict in some of the evidence, and it…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cargar v. FeeIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Indiana, Illinois & Iowa Railway Co. v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lynch v. KeckIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Kuhn v. PowellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Kostas v. ZarakostasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. First National Bank v. GibbsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Tucker v. EastridgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API